USB Complete or USB Confusing?



Is USB too universal? So far we don’t have fewer cables, just USB cables. And USB Type-C promises much.

One of the first technical books that I read cover-to-cover was not The Art of Electronics (although a good reference). It was USB Complete by Jan Axelson. I had recently begun a new role at TI in the Connectivity group, and her book helped me bootstrap myself into the detailed technical world of USB. Axelson has written several books, and as I await my copy of USB Complete (5th edition), I have to wonder where USB will go from here. SuperSpeed Plus (SS+), a.k.a. USB 3.1 Gen 2, can transfer data at up to 10 Gbps and reduces the power needed to transfer large amounts of data (over USB 2.0/High Speed).

The first USB chip was released by Intel® in 1995. The USB 1.0 specification was introduced in January 1996 and defined low speed at 1.5 Mbps and full speed at 12 Mbps. USB was originally devised to create a “plug and play” experience that also consolidated many cables and protocols. USB has replaced parallel ports for printers, PS/2 for the mouse, RS232 serial cables, and even A/C adapters.

USB has become complicated as the latest specs include up to 100 watts of power delivery (USB-PD), a connector that is impossible to plug in upside down (USB Type-C), and multiple data transfer rates while being backward compatible through all speeds defined in USB 2.0 specs. The USB-PD spec also defines USB alternate mode, enabling USB-C cables to support HDMI, DisplayPort, Thunderbolt™, MHL, and PCIe as a “full-featured” cable.

Should USB Complete be named USB Confusing? Most laptops still come with a mixture of USB ports, presumably slower USB ports for a mouse and/or keyboard (how fast can you type?). This makes sense until you connect a couple of external monitors via USB and plug into one of the slower ports. Not all USB Type-C cables are created equal. Apparently, many USB-C cables are not made to spec and can destroy connected electronics.

USB Type-C, USB 3.1, and USB-PD are not yet in wide use together as all-in-one, full-featured cables. We can look forward to reducing the total number of cables. Global adoption of USB Type-C appears to be primarily in the wireless segment.

 

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • TwitThis
Extension Media websites place cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our websites, you agree to placement of these cookies and to our Privacy Policy. Please click here to accept.